A Message of Thanks to Hillary Clinton

As tonight's results pour in (gotta love Oregon's haul-ass mail in vote counting) and Obama soars past the half-way mark on pledged delegates, I was thinking about this race and what it has meant.

And I wanted to extend a heartfelt thanks to Hillary Clinton.

Please hear me out below the jump.

Set the way-back machine to January. Obama has just won Iowa and he looks poised to win New Hampshire.

The pundits are falling all over themselves saying that the democratic primaries will be over in South Carolina. "How can she recover?" They're saying. "She loses Iowa, New Hampshire, Obama will win Nevada with the culinary union who will endorse tomorrow, and then he'll win South Carolina. She'll be 0 and 4, how can she continue to raise money after that?"

Then, she wins New Hampshire. As I saw that result come in, I was crushed. I truly believed that it was over. The only way, the ONLY way to stop Hillary Clinton, with all her advantages, was to wipe her out early and consolidate power before she had a chance to respond.

But, as Obama said the morning after the New Hampshire primary, it was right that he lost. Because what they were doing shouldn't be easy. The change they were trying to make should be hard.

But for me, I was just scared. I was scared of Clinton going negative, which I knew she would. I was scared that she would find something, possibly by accident, that would stick to Obama and permanently damage his candidacy. I was scared that he would become just another politician, dragged into the mud. I was scared that Obama wouldn't be able to handle it. That he had a glass jaw when it came to the irrational, racist, ludicrous attacks the republicans would throw at him.

Hillary Clinton has put those fears to rest, and for that I thank her.

As the race has dragged on and the delegate math got farther from Hillary's reach, I like to think that she and her advisers agreed to 'go republican' for the race. The thinking goes (I imagine) that if they played the game like republicans play the game and Obama still wins, then Obama's really all he's cracked up to be and deserves the nomination. However, if he can't deal with this stuff now, then he'll get killed in the general election.

The effective result is that this excruciating campaign against Hillary Clinton has been 'boot camp' for Obama in the realm of a national campaign.

For those of you who haven't served in the armed forces there's nothing nice about boot camp. You're sick all the time, you're always exhausted, you're always running or marching some damn place (often back and forth on the same field for hours). Every muscle aches, you have blisters, strained muscles, you lose your voice, and are forced to sit through some of the most miserable power point presentations ever produced while trying to stay awake. Meanwhile, people are yelling at you all the time no matter what you do, and you truly feel, every day, like you may have made the worst decision of your whole life.  

But when you come out on the other end, you know . . . not think, but KNOW what you are capable of. You know where your limits are, you know what it feels like to push past that 'comfort point' that NO ONE crosses unless they have to.

Four years ago, we had a quick and clean primary and ended up with a candidate who, for all his good qualities, could not handle the pressures and rapid cycle of the lunacy we call a national election. He was slow to recognize threats, slow to decide what to do about them, and unfocused about refuting them.

Barack Obama has now faced adversity on a national stage and handled it with dignity and grace. He has kept his eye on the ball, focused on what is important, and he has come out scarred, but strong. I was proud to see him improve in each debate as he got out of his comfort zone and sharpened his answers for the format. I was proud to listen to him after each victory AND defeat. I was proud when he first stood up for Wright and tried to elevate our national discourse. And I was proud when he severed ties after Wright essentially called him a liar.

Barack Obama has grown as a candidate and as a leader during this excruciating primary season. He has been vetted and seasoned by the contest.

The race is cooling down, but it's not quite over. The vitrol from both campaigns (if not their supporters and surrogates) has grown warm and appreciative. I expect these final contests to complete, the Michigan and Florida clusterf**k to be resolved, and for the party to unite around Barack Obama, a candidate who has been forged into steel in the heat of this battle.

And for that, Hillary Clinton, I thank you.



Display:


Re: A Message of Thanks to Hillary Clinton (2.00 / 3)

what exactly is the republican campaign she ran against him.

She barely touched the guy throughout the process , the things he stumbled on were self inflicted wounds it wasn't anything her camp did.

This has been one of the meekest primaries I have ever seen in terms of negativity.

She barely even mentions his name except for a small dig here and there .

I wonder what you mean by go republican.


Educated in a small town Taught to fear Jesus in a small town Used to daydream in that small town Another born romantic that's me.
by lori on Wed May 21, 2008 at 02:12:43 AM EST

You're right - Hillary is a pushover (2.00 / 1)


"McSame: He's Constipated and Ready to GO!
by Al Rodgers on Wed May 21, 2008 at 02:27:29 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: You're right - Hillary is a pushover (none / 0)

Well seeing that both have the same political program, a similar trackrecord in senate and that Obama is a relatively new candidate without a long history, there simply wasn't that much dirt to sling.

It was one of the more cordial campaign with only low level nastiness. It just looks different because the nomination took so long to resolve.

But if the only real examples are Bill clinton might have said a something nasty a couple of months ago and Obama re-used an old republican talking point about healthcare I'd say we've been blessed.

We had a contest with two inspiring candidates in which the slightly more inspiring candidate just edged out the other.


"Another problem we have...is that in election years we behave somewhat as primitive peoples do at the time of the full moon." --Harry Truman
by Ernst on Wed May 21, 2008 at 05:30:46 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: A Message of Thanks to Hillary Clinton (none / 0)

Me and my friends (a group of Hillary, Obama and Edwards supporters) were discussing it over the weekend. One of the biggest mistake she did was that she didnt go negative on him sooner. She waited too long to hit him back. In all debates, she kept saying we are all same and our real enemy are Republicans (those who talk about party unity should listen to the earliest debates). She didnt try to marginalize or define Obama early on. Like Obama was running on anti-Clinton message, she didnt run on anti-Obama message early on. Which is understandable as she wasnt sure who will be her real opponent. By the time SC happened, it was too short a time for Super Tuesday to change strategy.

Also, she didnt do anti-Obama GOTV events in all states and most of her supporters felt that she will win anyway so they turned out in smaller number. Later on, since March, her supporters  started coming out in hundreds as she became more anti-Obama. If only those Feb elections are done now, many of her supporters will come out now. But it's too late. But it also makes one wonder - did the anti-Obama voters just sit quiet during those early elections?

The worst fight is to fight with an underdog because you can not set the goals lower. In other words, since we always set the goals higher and take aim, the best way to fight is to fight as an underdog.


by Sandeep on Wed May 21, 2008 at 02:45:32 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: A Message of Thanks to Hillary Clinton (none / 0)

"most" should read "some".


by Sandeep on Wed May 21, 2008 at 02:48:55 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: A Message of Thanks to Hillary Clinton (2.00 / 1)

well you make some valid points , that said even as an underdog she rarely even mentions his name , almost never .

Believe me I watch almost all her rallies , yet some would say she has run a republican campaign.

Rather it is the Obama campaign that ran sort of what you said an anti - hillary message , which meant his campaign brought out the worst republican stereotype about her .

For example she is not trustworthy , she is a liar , she would do anything to win , these were all buzzwords that were poll tested and had been what the republicans had been drumming in for years.


Educated in a small town Taught to fear Jesus in a small town Used to daydream in that small town Another born romantic that's me.
by lori on Wed May 21, 2008 at 02:51:38 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: A Message of Thanks to Hillary Clinton (none / 0)

But let us not forget, at the time, Hillary was the "inevitable" candidate.  Everyone was running against her.


John McCain smells like mothballs.
by asherrem on Wed May 21, 2008 at 02:53:55 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: A Message of Thanks to Hillary Clinton (none / 0)

The amazing thing is that exit polls consistently show that more voters feel that Clinton attacks unfairly than feel that Obama does. Either way (you're right, and Obama objectively attacks more unfairly, or you're wrong and he doesn't) this is impressive. I want a candidate who can attack McCain and have people feel his attacks were fair. I want a candidate who can't be attacked without voters feeling the attacks are unfair.

Clinton fought hard against Obama, at the very least, she kept the spotlight on him long enough for his potential vulnerabilities to be exposed. He certainly is a much better candidate than he was a year ago (or even 4 months ago), and we all owe Clinton a debt of thanks for that.


by letterc on Wed May 21, 2008 at 05:39:39 AM EST
[ Parent ]

where would she had done that?? (none / 0)

Iowa is famed for punishing negative campaigning.

Even subtle, negatives.

Look at Dean-Gephardt in Iowa 2004.

Iowans got p....sed when Hillary union supporter AFSCME sent out a negative flyer knocking Obama and Edwards.

The first negative air ad, was a radio ad Clinton used in SC, and they had to pull it, cuz of the backlash it stirred.

think of the SC debate when Obama and Hillary had an exchanged, their numbers temporarily dropped and Edwards numbers temporarily rose.

Negative campaign within a party is touchy.  Nobody likes seeing one Democrat attack another.

If Hillary didn't go negative, it wasn't cuz she's soft campaigner.

Hell, Romney poured a ton of money on negative ads and he lost.


"McSame: He's Constipated and Ready to GO!
by Al Rodgers on Wed May 21, 2008 at 03:21:16 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: where would she had done that?? (none / 0)

the Dean-Gephardt fight subtle? Heh, that isn't a qualifier I'd use.

Point is that Clinton never did well in Iowa right from the start.

Obama had a lot of regional advantage there and Edwards had been courting them for 4 years. They both outpolled Clinton all along with most pollsters.

In fact in aggregate Hillary had gained slightly over the course of the campaign.

Negative campaigning wasn't the reason she lost Iowa.


"Another problem we have...is that in election years we behave somewhat as primitive peoples do at the time of the full moon." --Harry Truman
by Ernst on Wed May 21, 2008 at 05:39:34 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: where would she had done that?? (2.00 / 1)

Well just bashing isnt useful negative. Defining your opponent is an useful negative tactic (in politics and business).

With all the money/connections/consultants, I am sure Hillary knew about Rev. Wright long back. She didnt bring it out and she didnt use other channels to bring it out either. She allowed it to be dictated by news agencies. (well she might have tried but NBC & CNN might have said no but she wasnt cozy to Fox at that earlier stage). What if she had leaked out "GDamn...." before Iowa? Tim Russert asked Obama about it few times before Iowa but still Hillary didnt pick it up for attack.

Lets take Social Security as another example - Obama changed his positions 3 times in 2007. I have 3 different interviews of him and every time he picked a different position. But did Clinton campaign paint him as a flip flopper like Bush did with Kerry? The people in the heartland associate the word flip flopper with Kerry. Chuck Todd wrote a piece on the 3 positions of Obama in 10 months on NBC. But Hillary kept talking about Republicans as the enemy. Obama approached Hillary as the enemy. So he was ready with anti-Hillary points. His goal was first win the primary.


by Sandeep on Wed May 21, 2008 at 05:43:54 AM EST
[ Parent ]

you right - Hillary was soft (none / 0)


"McSame: He's Constipated and Ready to GO!
by Al Rodgers on Wed May 21, 2008 at 03:23:33 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Remember how this all started.... (none / 0)

Paul Lukasiak (NOT a member of any lunatic fringe group) reported at Firedoglake a few weeks ago:

"Is it a timing thing? Because all the Democrats, including Obama, did whatever they could to "scorch earth" Hillary's chances starting in September (2007).

I don't know if people just forget about it, or don't think it matters, but Hillary Clinton was running a relentlessly positive, issue oriented campaign through last September -- in fact all the candidates were up until that point. But no one was getting any real traction -- Hillary's numbers went up all summer, and Obama's went down, Edwards couldn't get media and languished in third place, and there were another half -dozen "WHO?" candidates.

Running positive against Clinton wasn't working, so everyone, including Obama (except for Richardson) went negative on her -- attacking her relentlessly to drive up her negatives so they would have a shot.

So is it just the timing? Or have people forgotten about that.

And, when it comes to "scorched earth" campaign tactics, nothing beats the "swift-boating" of the Clinton on the race issue in South Carolina by the Obama campaign and its supporters. And it was "swift-boating", it was a big fat lie that Clinton was running a racist campaign, and the accusation made no sense; given the demographics of South Carolina, why would Clinton choose to start running racist then?


by CoyoteCreek on Wed May 21, 2008 at 08:22:08 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: A Message of Thanks to Hillary Clinton (none / 0)

Should I start with kindergate? How about selling drugs? Perhaps comparing Obama to Jackson (a candidate whose only similarity with Obama is his skin color and who wasn't a viable candidate in 1984 or '88). Maybe everything that has come out of Geraldine Ferraro's mouth for the past two months?  (Obama's lucky to be black? Really? That's like saying Ray Charles is lucky to be blind. It's ridiculous.) How about calling him weak on abortion rights because he followed a plan devised by Planned Parenthood? (The Chicago NOW president switched from Clinton to Obama over that one). Referring to his well documented (in VIDEO) stance on the Iraq War as a 'fairy tale'. Stating that his supporters didn't need a president, they just wanted a 'hip black friend'. Stating McCain was more ready for the presidency than Obama. (I have passed the Commander-in-Chief threshold, McCain has passed the Commander-in-Chief threshold, Obama has a speech he gave in 2002). Repeatedly diminishing and demeaning ALL who support Obama as, somehow, less democrat or less intelligent or less American than those who support Clinton. (Latte-sipping crowd, they've got too much time on their hands, don't need a president, don't have any social needs, cult-like)

This diary wasn't started to fight about this stuff, and I'm sure that any or all of these things can and will be defended by many Hillary supporters. That's why her campaign said them.


by EvilAsh on Wed May 21, 2008 at 03:38:54 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: A Message of Thanks to Hillary Clinton (2.00 / 1)

My intent is not to fight and go thru old points again. But I have to say this that you completely missed the point and twisted it with examples which dont fit the discussion. Early on means 2007 Jan to 2007 Nov, everything pre-Iowa.


by Sandeep on Wed May 21, 2008 at 05:53:11 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: A Message of Thanks to Hillary Clinton (none / 0)

I was actually replying to lori in the first post. She was asking 'when did Clinton EVER go negative on Obama'.

You're right about pre-Iowa, Clinton was talking past all her opponents. And Obama WAS the one to throw the first stone, but it was a pretty small and legitimate stone.

Obama requested her records from her White House years be released. Since Clinton (at the time) was harping on all her extensive experience, it was a legitimate request. I believe the quote was along the lines of, "She is campaigning on her experience. She has every right to do so, since she obviously feels that her years in the White House was valuable experience. However, in my view, what she can't do is take credit for all the successes of the Clinton White House and take no responsibility for the failures. This is why I believe it would be helpful to have her records from that period. She should show the voters what she did during that period instead of just talk about it."
Clinton's response, to me anyway, didn't pass the smell test. "We're trying to get them to release the records, but it takes time." The reason it doesn't pass is:

  1. Bill Clinton was the freakin' president and it is HIS presidential library we're talking about.
  2. Hillary Clinton has known for a LONG time that she was going to run for president, so there was ample time to get this stuff together.
  3. Bill was the one who had the documents classified for the additional years in the first place.

When asked directly about this, Obama called it disingenuous. The interviewers repeatedly tried to get him to call Hillary a liar and he refused.

There are legitimate negative arguments and there are stupid negative arguments. I believe this one falls into the former category. I mean, refusing to take someone at their word that they accomplished everything they say they accomplished isn't exactly a personal attack. It's akin to checking the references on a resume.


by EvilAsh on Wed May 21, 2008 at 04:48:24 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: A Message of Thanks to Hillary Clinton (none / 0)

Drivin' and Cryin' (a local band--Athens, GA--I grew up listening to and actually open for once) had a great song called "Scarred and Smarter." It came to mind reading this.

Here's a poor-quality video of them playing it in my hometown back in 1987.


by DPW on Wed May 21, 2008 at 02:40:55 AM EST

Re: A Message of Thanks to Hillary Clinton (none / 0)

Should be "Scarred but Smarter."


by DPW on Wed May 21, 2008 at 02:43:04 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: A Message of Thanks to Hillary Clinton (none / 0)

Wow that song is actually damn good.  Is there a place to listen to any of their other songs or is that youtube vid pretty much it?


And so, may evil beware and may good dress warmly and eat lots of fresh vegetables.
by thatpurplestuff on Wed May 21, 2008 at 03:01:47 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: A Message of Thanks to Hillary Clinton (none / 0)

They actually became relatively big with their album Fly Me Courageous. This is from their first album Scarred But Smarter. They've recently reunited to play some shows, but the lead singer, Kevin Kinney, normally just tours as a solo artist.

I liked their first two albums the most. It's a mix of punk inspired college-rock and alt-country (The "Drivin'" refers to the rock, the "Cryin'" refers to the country-esque stuff). Kevin Kinney's solo stuff is good, too, if you're into older Dylan-style songwriting.

You can get their stuff on itunes. Fan favorites include Honeysuckle Blue, Straight to Hell, Scarred But Smarter, and House for Sale. Unfortunately, Kevin Kinney's solo stuff isn't on itunes, but his album McDougald Blues is worth a listen if you can get your hands on it (I assume it's available on amazon).


by DPW on Wed May 21, 2008 at 03:13:22 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: A Message of Thanks to Hillary Clinton (none / 0)

Mystery Road is the second major album I was referring to, just to be clear. Not as much rock, but pretty good. I would call it bar music for college kids.


by DPW on Wed May 21, 2008 at 03:17:29 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: A Message of Thanks to Hillary Clinton (none / 0)

Much appreciated!  I'm a sucker for alt-country.  Been on a Roger Clyne and the Peacemakers kick lately.  Anyway, thanks again!


And so, may evil beware and may good dress warmly and eat lots of fresh vegetables.
by thatpurplestuff on Wed May 21, 2008 at 03:20:04 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: A Message of Thanks to Hillary Clinton (none / 0)

Alot of alt-country is hit or miss with me. I'm a big Wilco fan, though, especially the current line-up. Tweedy's the man.

I'll check out Roger Clyne and the Peacemakers; I haven't really listened to them before.


by DPW on Wed May 21, 2008 at 03:25:26 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: A Message of Thanks to Hillary Clinton (none / 0)

Roger Clyne was the lead singer of The Refreshments... they had a few hits back in the 90's but broke up shortly thereafter.  He's pretty solidly in the alt-country college music category (especially his Refreshments stuff), but all of his music makes for good listening.  He actually got pretty political a few years ago with his "!Americano!" album, which is also really good but a bit different from his regular fare.


And so, may evil beware and may good dress warmly and eat lots of fresh vegetables.
by thatpurplestuff on Wed May 21, 2008 at 03:29:53 AM EST
[ Parent ]

I don't thank Hillary but (none / 0)

I do give you credit for your part about how you felt after New Hampshire.  I felt doomed by that as well, and you expressed all the same reasons I had for fearing the worst.  I thought Obama's (or Edwards') only chance was to win the Iowa/NH exacta in order to get a half-decent chance of surviving Super Tuesday.

It turned out Obama was a more resilient candidate than I would have believed, that the American people (including hard-working white people) were more enlightened and open-minded than I gave them credit for, and that the desire for change in this country actually COULD overcome the huge inherent advantages of the Democratic Party's elite and privileged.

I am forced to admit that I'm slightly less cynical today than I was five months ago.  But only slightly!

And I'll turn on Obama in a heartbeat, once he becomes president, if he doesn't get us out of Iraq, fast.  Take that to the bank.


by Dumbo on Wed May 21, 2008 at 02:54:42 AM EST

Re: A Message of Thanks to Hillary Clinton (2.00 / 1)

But for me, I was just scared. I was scared of Clinton going negative, which I knew she would. I was scared that she would find something, possibly by accident, that would stick to Obama and permanently damage his candidacy. I was scared that he would become just another politician, dragged into the mud. I was scared that Obama wouldn't be able to handle it. That he had a glass jaw when it came to the irrational, racist, ludicrous attacks the republicans would throw at him.

Wow, this is a bit dramatic. And I think you are being too protective.  For Pete's sake, you are electing a POTUS not trying to take care of a delicate child!


by observer11 on Wed May 21, 2008 at 03:57:14 AM EST

True (none / 0)

but as we've seen on a NUMBER of both pro-Hillary and pro-Obama sites, people tend to get protective, often to an irrational degree. I mean, for God's sake, have you SEEN hillaryis44.com? It's freakin' nuts over there.

I always believe Obama would make the best president of the bunch, but, him being new to the stage, I wasn't sure if he would be able to beat back the attacks well enough. It's less taking care of a delicate child than watching a good friend hop into the ocean to swim to Great Britain. You know he's a good swimmer, but that doesn't mean he's not going to drown.


by EvilAsh on Wed May 21, 2008 at 04:54:03 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: A Message of Thanks to Hillary Clinton (none / 0)

No. I don't protect Hillary.  She is smart, compassionate and resilient. I am way too young and to baby her. In fact, she is so tough and works so hard that she inspire me to be stronger and better in everything I do.  


by observer11 on Wed May 21, 2008 at 05:47:34 PM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.